I feel social context, culture and cooperation does play a role in building robust communities, but perhaps when it comes to « the concern of being alone, » social viewpoint need not dictate one thing as harmless as going to dinner alone, dacning on the ground alone, taking a trip alone, or having that cup of java at the cafe.I feel it is gonna take just a little extra practice to free the social situations that is « you might be bizarre to be doing this alone, » however not less than I acknowledge the complete irrationality and errors in this manner. Acceptance of both myself and others can at least be a place to begin to have more joyous and unhibited experiences as dictated by the highest of the self-actualization triangle.
It is just when man and men are « awakened » to the only one Who’s eternally woke that they can themselves be awakened in different things. In fact, the hindrance to this is our personal inability to love. For the first, and most fundamental, virtue to be crushed under the load of human pleasure is love (1 Cor 自己実現する 13).
Nevertheless, this human machine is exclusive in that it might probably examine the natural setting by which it lives and mirror upon how it should stay in that setting. That is the heart of the modernist’s enigma, for all times certainly doesn’t seem determined, even if, given modernism’s major philosophical tenets, free will is essentially an illusion. No matter this enigma, the fact is that in contrast to different beings in the identical natural environment, the human organism has attained, albeit surprisingly, this strange emergent property of self-reflexivity. Nonetheless, there’s nothing beyond the natural setting and the self-reflexive human investigator that may inform the investigator how she ought to dwell. As such, solely the what of life will be known.